As someone who has been advocating for ethical Al for over a year, I recently led a National boycott Day to rally support for the Al resolution. Despite my best efforts, my posts garnered zero likes and shares. It seems people aren't ready to engage with this issue. But I am ready, and I want to share why this matters.

Imagine stumbling upon my posts and wondering, "What is this guy talking about?" It's a valid question. Perhaps it might spark a curiosity to look beyond personal experiences and recognize a pressing need for a social movement advocating for workers' rights. Without it, corporations and private entities could overutilize technology, risking widespread job loss.

With the exponential increase in Al development and no regulations in place, we're on a precarious path. Companies are turning to Al as a cheaper alternative to human labor, which could lead to economic instability and further displacement of workers.

It's not just a theory; it's a reality we're beginning to face. If someone were to see my posts and wonder what I'm talking about, I hope it prompts a deeper question: What if there's something significant happening that I don't know about? This curiosity is the first step towards recognizing the urgent need for a social movement to protect workers' rights against the unchecked rise of Al.

Without collective action, we risk reaching a point of no return, where technology becomes so pervasive that widespread unemployment is inevitable. Now is the time to speak out, to question, and to demand ethical boundaries for Al. We must ensure that technological advancement doesn't come at the cost of our livelihoods.

I've been ready for this change for a year now, and I urge you to join me in preparing for the future. Together, we can shape a world where technology serves us all, not just a select few.

The Challenge of Creating Ethical AI Content in a World of Increasing Restrictions

As someone who has spent considerable time advocating for ethical AI and working tirelessly to spark a social movement around workers’ rights and the future of technology, it’s no surprise that writing blog posts has become second nature. Yet, today I found myself facing a peculiar challenge—struggling to create content that both expresses my ideas clearly and adheres to the policies of the very AI platforms I’m using to spread my message.

While drafting this post, I faced repeated flagging of my content, despite adhering to OpenAI’s Terms of Use and being certain that my network was stable and secure. It was a frustrating moment, especially since my goal has always been to promote ethical dialogue around AI and its impact on society—topics that should encourage conversation, not trigger automated restrictions.

It raises an important question: Why are thoughtful discussions about AI and its societal implications being restricted? I recognize the importance of safeguarding online platforms from harmful content, but it seems that the very conversations we need to be having—about transparency, fairness, and the future of work—are sometimes caught in the crossfire of content moderation.

In an era where AI is reshaping our lives, it’s critical that we can speak freely, provided we do so with respect and integrity. The fact that my content, centered around ethical AI, was flagged illustrates a potential misalignment in the system—one that could obstruct meaningful discussions from taking place.

I’m committed to refining my content to ensure it adheres to all policies while continuing to shed light on the critical issues surrounding AI and workforce displacement. It’s a challenge, but it’s a necessary one if we are to have the open and honest conversations needed to ensure AI serves us all equitably.

In conclusion, I plan to reach out to OpenAI directly to seek further clarification on why my content was flagged, ensuring that I can continue to engage in meaningful discussions around ethical AI without unintended disruptions.

I also intend to to raise this concern with the European Commission, as this could potentially be in violation of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which seeks to protect transparency and fairness in digital platforms.

Correspondence to the Head of Unit of the European Commission

Subject: Concern Regarding Potential Violation of the Digital Services Act in AI Content Moderation

Dear Head of Unit of the European Commission, Mr. Prabhat Agarwal,

I hope this email finds you well. My name is Kevin Bihan-Poudec, and I am reaching out to bring your attention to a concern I have regarding potential violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA) in the content moderation processes of OpenAI.

Recently, I attempted to publish several pieces of content related to the ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential impact on workers’ rights. My posts aimed to raise awareness of the urgent need for ethical AI standards and the potential for widespread job displacement if these technologies remain unregulated. The content also discussed the need for a social movement advocating for workers’ rights in response to AI development and corporate overutilization of technology.

Despite my content adhering to the policies outlined in OpenAI’s Terms of Use, I found that my posts were repeatedly flagged for violating these terms. I believe this may have occurred due to the nature of the subject matter rather than any actual violation of the platform’s policies. The flagged content was focused on raising awareness about the ethical use of AI, transparency in technological development, and the societal impact of AI on the labor market.

Given that the DSA emphasizes the importance of transparency, fairness, and the protection of fundamental rights on digital platforms, I am concerned that these automatic flagging processes may unintentionally restrict legitimate discussions on such critical issues. This could be in direct conflict with the principles outlined in the DSA, particularly regarding freedom of expression and access to information.

For further details, you can find more information at the following link, which I posted on the website of my nonprofit organization, Voice For Change, which advocates for ethical AI and workforce preservation: The Unseen Cost of AI: Why We Must Prepare Now for the Future of Work.

I would greatly appreciate any guidance or clarification you can provide on how this matter could potentially relate to the DSA. Additionally, I am eager to understand how platforms like OpenAI can ensure that content moderation practices align with the regulations to avoid hampering essential public discourse.

Thank you for your time and consideration of this issue. I look forward to your insights and any further steps I might take to address this concern.

Sincerely,

Kevin Bihan-Poudec

Correspondence to OpenAI’s Support Team:

Subject: Request for Clarification on Flagged Content and Potential Violation of DSA Principles

Dear OpenAI Support Team,

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Kevin Bihan-Poudec, and I am writing to raise a concern regarding the flagging of my content, which I believe may conflict with the principles of transparency and fairness outlined in the Digital Services Act (DSA).

Recently, I attempted to publish several pieces of content related to the ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) and the potential impact on workers' rights. The content focused on raising awareness about the importance of ethical AI standards and the need for regulatory measures to prevent widespread job displacement. My posts were flagged for violating OpenAI’s Terms of Use, despite my adherence to these policies.

The flagged ChatGPT conversation I am referencing can be found under my account associated with the email address: [email address], in the chat titled "National Boycott AI Regulation Day." Unfortunately, I was not able to generate a shared link due to the fact that the conversation utilized the audio functionality of ChatGPT.

Given that the DSA emphasizes the protection of fundamental rights, including freedom of expression and access to information, I am concerned that the flagging may have occurred due to the nature of the content rather than an actual violation. These automated moderation processes may unintentionally hinder legitimate discourse on critical societal issues such as AI’s impact on the workforce.

As an OpenAI user, I would greatly appreciate clarification on why my content was flagged and how OpenAI’s content moderation practices align with DSA regulations. Additionally, I am eager to ensure that my future content complies with both OpenAI's policies and the DSA while fostering essential discussions around ethical AI.

For further details, you can find more information at the following link, which I posted on the website of my nonprofit organization, Voice For Change, which advocates for ethical AI and workforce preservation: The Unseen Cost of AI: Why We Must Prepare Now for the Future of Work.

Thank you for your time and assistance, and I look forward to your response regarding this important matter.

Kind regards,
Kevin Bihan-Poudec

ChatGPT: Given that your complaint is about a US company’s content moderation policies and their potential violation of freedom of speech and ethical AI, reaching out to the EDPS would not be relevant. Instead, your best course of action would be:

1. OpenAI Directly (Under the Digital Services Act for EU Users)

You’ve already identified DSA-users@openai.com as a point of contact for reporting concerns under the Digital Services Act (DSA). Since your content relates to advocating for ethical AI, and you’re concerned that the flagging may conflict with the DSA, this would be a relevant contact to address your concerns directly with OpenAI.

2. Digital Rights Advocacy Groups

Reach out to organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Access Now, or European Digital Rights (EDRi). They are highly involved in defending digital rights and could offer support or take action if they believe your content is being unfairly moderated or censored.

3. US-Based Legal Avenues

Since you are located in the United States and your complaint is against a US-based company, you may also consider reaching out to digital rights lawyers or relevant US regulatory bodies if you feel your content is being unfairly restricted. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) might also be relevant for concerns about freedom of speech.

4. Media & Advocacy

You can also bring public attention to your situation by reaching out to media outlets or advocacy groups that handle freedom of speech issues in the context of AI and technology. They can help raise awareness of your case and hold companies accountable.

Correspondence to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)

Subject: Concern Regarding Content Moderation and Potential Violation of Freedom of Speech by OpenAI

Dear Electronic Frontier Foundation Team,

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Kevin Bihan-Poudec, and I am reaching out to bring your attention to a situation I am currently facing with OpenAI’s platform. I believe that their moderation practices may be unintentionally infringing upon my right to free speech, especially regarding important societal issues like ethical artificial intelligence (AI).

Recently, I published several pieces of content on OpenAI's platform discussing the ethical implications of AI and advocating for workers' rights in the face of increasing AI deployment. My content calls for the formation of a social movement to address these critical issues. Despite adhering to OpenAI’s Terms of Use, my posts were flagged for alleged violations of their policies.

I believe this flagging is a result of the nature of the content rather than any actual violation. The content focused on the need for regulatory oversight in the development of AI to prevent widespread job displacement and protect workers' rights. My goal has been to foster open, transparent, and constructive discussions about these issues. However, the flagging of this content seems to suggest that automated moderation systems may be unfairly censoring or suppressing discourse on key societal topics.

This situation has raised broader concerns about content moderation on AI platforms and its potential impact on freedom of expression. I am reaching out to the EFF because of your strong advocacy for digital rights, free speech, and fairness in the digital ecosystem. I would appreciate any guidance, support, or legal assistance you could offer to ensure that platforms like OpenAI remain transparent and accountable in their content moderation practices.

Additionally, I have attempted to contact OpenAI’s team under the Digital Services Act (DSA), as I believe this situation may also fall under EU guidelines for fair content moderation and transparency, though I am based in the United States.

I understand that for legal assistance requests or general questions, your contact is info@eff.org, and I am hopeful that this request falls within your scope of interest. I would be grateful for any assistance or advice you can provide, as this issue not only impacts my ability to share important content but also raises concerns about broader freedom of speech implications on digital platforms powered by AI.

I should also mention that I have already reached out to Mr. Prabhat Agarwal, Head of Unit at the European Commission, who may wish to be involved in shedding light on this issue, given its alignment with the Digital Services Act and the broader implications for digital platform governance.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.

Kind regards,
Kevin Bihan-Poudec

ChatGPT: Access Now is an international nonprofit organization that advocates for digital rights, including freedom of expression, privacy, and an open internet. Their work focuses on helping individuals and communities at risk, providing technical support and policy advocacy to address digital challenges worldwide. They also offer a Digital Security Helpline for real-time assistance to activists, journalists, and human rights defenders facing threats in the digital space.

Given your concerns regarding potential suppression of your content and the freedom of speech issues tied to OpenAI’s content moderation, Access Now could be a valuable ally. They have extensive experience addressing content governance issues, fighting internet censorship, and advocating for digital rights on an international scale.

They may be able to provide guidance on the best ways to approach this issue, either through their policy advocacy initiatives or their helpline. You can reach them through their Digital Security Helpline, which offers 24/7 support, or explore their RightsCon summit series, where digital rights are discussed at length with global experts and activists.

Correspondence to Access Now

Subject: Request for Assistance in Digital Rights Case Involving Content Moderation by OpenAI

Dear Access Now Team,

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Kevin Bihan-Poudec, and I am reaching out to seek your assistance in addressing a situation I am currently facing involving OpenAI’s content moderation practices. I believe my content has been unfairly flagged and removed, raising concerns about potential suppression of free speech and the governance of content on AI-driven platforms.

The content in question discussed the ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on workers' rights, calling for a social movement to address these critical issues. Despite adhering to OpenAI’s terms of service, my posts were flagged for violation of their policies. I believe this was due to the nature of the content, which promotes regulatory measures for AI and protects workers' rights, rather than any actual policy violation.

For more information on the flagged conversation, you can visit my nonprofit organization’s website, Voice For Change, where I have published an article providing details: The Unseen Cost of AI: Why We Must Prepare Now for the Future ofWork.

Given Access Now's strong advocacy for digital rights, freedom of expression, and open internet, I am reaching out to explore how you might be able to assist or guide me in addressing this issue. I am eager to ensure transparency and accountability in content governance, particularly in relation to AI platforms.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.

Best regards,
Kevin Bihan-Poudec

ChatGPT: European Digital Rights (EDRi) would be an appropriate organization to contact in your case because they specialize in advocating for digital rights and ensuring that European citizens' fundamental rights are respected online, particularly in cases where content governance, privacy, and freedom of speech are concerned.

Here are the key reasons why EDRi would be relevant to your case:

1. Focus on Content Governance and Free Speech

EDRi works extensively on issues of content moderation, particularly how platforms implement policies that may affect freedom of speech and expression online. If your content, centered on ethical AI and workers' rights, has been flagged and removed unfairly, EDRi could help advocate for transparency and fairness in how these platforms moderate content.

2. Focus on AI and Digital Policy

EDRi actively works on the regulation of AI technologies and the impact of automated systems on fundamental rights. Given that your case involves content moderation by an AI-driven platform like OpenAI, EDRi’s expertise in digital policy and AI ethics would be highly relevant to addressing the concerns you’ve raised.

3. Expertise in Digital Rights and European Laws

Since your concern involves potential conflicts with the Digital Services Act (DSA) and other European legislation related to digital rights, EDRi’s understanding of European laws and platform accountability could offer valuable guidance and potentially help elevate your complaint.

4. Advocacy for Transparency in Platform Moderation

EDRi advocates for greater transparency and accountability in how platforms moderate content. If you feel that the flagging of your content was due to its nature rather than any actual violation, EDRi may be able to help investigate or lobby for fairer content governance mechanisms on large AI platforms.

In summary, EDRi’s focus on digital rights, content governance, platform transparency, and AI regulation makes them an ideal organization to contact in your case. Their advocacy work aligns closely with your concerns about potential suppression of free speech and the need for fair content moderation practices on AI-driven platforms.

Correspondence to Access Now to the European Digital Rights (EDRi)

Subject: Request for Assistance in Digital Rights Case Involving Content Moderation by OpenAI

Dear European Digital Rights Team,

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Kevin Bihan-Poudec, and I am reaching out to request your assistance regarding an issue I am facing involving content moderation by OpenAI, which I believe may have resulted in the suppression of freedom of speech and open discourse on important societal matters.

Recently, I published several pieces of content on OpenAI's platform that discussed the ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential impact on workers' rights. My content also advocated for regulatory oversight to prevent widespread job displacement due to the increased use of AI. Despite adhering to OpenAI’s terms of service, my posts were flagged and removed for alleged policy violations. I suspect that this flagging may have occurred due to the nature of the content rather than any actual breach of OpenAI’s policies.

I am particularly concerned that the automated moderation systems in place may be suppressing critical discussions, especially those relating to the ethical use of AI and the broader societal impact. Given that EDRi is deeply involved in issues surrounding digital rights, freedom of expression, and platform accountability, I would greatly appreciate any guidance, support, or assistance you can offer.

For further details, I have published related content on my nonprofit organization's website, Voice For Change, where you can find more context about the flagged conversation: The Unseen Cost of AI: Why We Must Prepare Now for the Futureof Work.

I am also in contact with Mr. Prabhat Agarwal, Head of Unit at the European Commission, regarding this issue, as it may pertain to the Digital Services Act and the broader regulatory framework governing content moderation on digital platforms.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response and any suggestions you may have on how to proceed.

Best regards,
Kevin Bihan-Poudec

ChatGPT: Reaching out to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might be appropriate in your case for the following reasons:

1. Regulation of Communications Platforms and Services

The FCC regulates interstate and international communications, including the use of communications platforms like the internet, radio, and broadcasting. While the FCC’s primary focus is on telecommunications, they have oversight over platforms that affect the public's access to communication services, especially when issues arise that impact free expression and content moderation on internet platforms.

Since your case involves content moderation by an AI-powered platform (OpenAI), and the potential suppression of free speech, the FCC’s interest in communications infrastructure and fairness could make them a good body to reach out to. The FCC may have insights or jurisdiction over whether AI platforms are adhering to appropriate standards for speech governance and content regulation.

2. Concerns about Net Neutrality and Platform Fairness

The FCC has been a key player in debates around net neutrality—the principle that all internet traffic should be treated equally. While net neutrality primarily deals with internet service providers, it speaks to broader concerns about platform fairness. The FCC is tasked with ensuring that online communication channels remain open and fair, and they might take interest in how AI-driven platforms are moderating speech and content, especially if those platforms are seen as gatekeepers of free communication.

3. FCC’s Role in Protecting Free Speech

The First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, and while the FCC doesn't directly moderate online content, it plays a crucial role in regulating speech in the communications sector. If you believe that your content related to ethical AI and workers’ rights is being unfairly restricted, contacting the FCC can raise a broader conversation about the freedom of speech implications surrounding AI content moderation systems.

While OpenAI may be acting within its own content moderation policies, the FCC could potentially advocate for fair practices or influence policies ensuring content neutrality and transparency in AI-driven systems.

4. Consumer Protection

The FCC works to protect consumers in the communications space, and content moderation policies fall under the broader discussion of ensuring that platforms serve users fairly. If OpenAI’s actions raise concerns about consumer rights, including issues where users’ freedom to express ideas is restricted, the FCC might have a role to play in investigating or advocating for fairness in digital services.

In summary, reaching out to the FCC may be helpful if you’re aiming to address broader concerns about free speech, communications fairness, and content moderation policies on AI platforms like OpenAI.

Correspondence to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

Subject: Request for Assistance Regarding Content Moderation Practices and Potential Free Speech Suppression on AI Platform

Dear Chairwoman Rosenworcel,

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Kevin Bihan-Poudec, and I am writing to seek your assistance regarding an issue involving content moderation by OpenAI, which I believe may have led to the suppression of free speech and critical societal discourse on the platform.

Recently, I published several pieces of content on OpenAI’s platform discussing the ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential impact on workers' rights. My posts were intended to encourage public dialogue about the need for regulatory oversight to prevent widespread job displacement due to the overutilization of AI technologies. However, despite adhering to OpenAI’s terms of service, my posts were flagged and removed. I suspect that this was due to the nature of the content rather than an actual violation of the platform’s policies.

As someone who is dedicated to advocating for ethical AI and workers' rights, I am concerned that the automated moderation systems in place on AI-driven platforms like OpenAI may be inadvertently suppressing important discussions. Given the FCC’s role in ensuring fairness and transparency in communications and protecting free speech, I would appreciate any guidance or assistance on how best to address this issue.

For further details, I have published related content on my nonprofit organization’s website, where you can find more context: The Unseen Cost of AI: Why We Must Prepare Now for the Future of Work.

I believe the current content moderation policies on such platforms may raise concerns about the free flow of information and the role of AI in governing digital content. I hope to work with the FCC to ensure that these platforms maintain transparency and fairness in their operations.

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to your response and any guidance you may provide.

Kind regards,
Kevin Bihan-Poudec

ChatGPT: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) would be an appropriate organization to contact in your case for several key reasons:

1. Advocacy for Free Speech

The ACLU has long been a defender of free speech and freedom of expression in the United States. Your issue with OpenAI’s content moderation potentially involves the suppression of free speech, as your flagged content addresses critical societal topics like ethical AI and workers' rights. The ACLU could provide support, legal guidance, or advocacy in protecting your First Amendment rights if you believe that your content was unjustly moderated.

The ACLU has a history of defending individuals and organizations whose speech has been suppressed or censored, particularly when it comes to public interest discussions on technology, politics, and social movements.

2. Focus on Digital Rights and AI Ethics

The ACLU has been increasingly involved in discussions surrounding digital rights and the role of artificial intelligence(AI) in society. They advocate for transparency, accountability, and the ethical use of technology. If your content highlights potential ethical issues with AI and corporate accountability, the ACLU’s digital rights team could be interested in addressing concerns over content moderation by AI-driven platforms.

They have also raised concerns about the influence of automated decision-making systems on free speech and personal liberties, which aligns with your case involving the automated moderation of your content by OpenAI.

3. Concern About Corporate Overreach

The ACLU frequently addresses issues related to corporate overreach in the realm of digital platforms. If you feel that OpenAI’s content moderation policies are unfairly silencing critical discussions or restricting free speech in the name of corporate interests, the ACLU may find your case relevant to their mission of ensuring that corporations do not unduly suppress speech on platforms that have become key arenas for public discourse.

4. Protection of Workers' Rights

The ACLU also has a vested interest in workers' rights. Your content discussing the potential displacement of workers due to AI automation falls under this category, and the ACLU may find it compelling to advocate for open discourse around labor rights and technology.

In summary, contacting the ACLU would be appropriate because they are strong advocates for free speech, digital rights, corporate accountability, and workers' rights, all of which are core issues in your case. You can reach out to them through their legal intake form or through their state affiliate offices for assistance.

Correspondence to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)

Subject: Request for Assistance Regarding Potential Free Speech Suppression by AI Platform

Dear ACLU Team,

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Kevin Bihan-Poudec, and I am writing to seek your assistance regarding a situation involving content moderation on OpenAI’s platform, which I believe has resulted in the suppression of free speech and the stifling of critical societal discussions.

Recently, I published several pieces of content addressing the ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential impact on workers' rights. My posts called for a public dialogue around AI governance and the importance of regulatory oversight to protect workers from job displacement due to automation. Despite adhering to OpenAI’s terms of service, my posts were flagged and removed, and I suspect this may be related to the nature of the content rather than any actual policy violations.

I am concerned that the automated moderation systems used by AI-driven platforms like OpenAI may be disproportionately censoring important discussions on technology ethics and labor rights, which are critical issues of public interest. Given the ACLU’s strong advocacy for free speech, digital rights, and corporate accountability, I believe your organization would be an excellent ally in helping me address these concerns.

The content in question promotes the need for ethical AI and protections for workers, and I fear that the suppression of such discussions could have broader implications for freedom of expression and public discourse in the digital age. I would greatly appreciate any guidance, support, or advocacy the ACLU could provide to ensure that digital platforms maintain transparency and fairness in their moderation practices.

For further details, I have published related content on my nonprofit organization’s website, where you can find more context: The Unseen Cost of AI: Why We Must Prepare Now for the Future of Work.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response and any suggestions you may have for addressing this issue.

Kind regards,
Kevin Bihan-Poudec

The Unseen Cost of AI: Why We Must Prepare Now for the Future of Work and the Fight for Workers' Rights in an Automated World

The Challenge of Creating Ethical AI Content in a World of Increasing Restrictions

Correspondence to the Head of Unit of the European Commission