American Politics Is Changing: Loyalty Over Qualifications
In today’s political landscape, experience and expertise seem to be taking a backseat to loyalty and fanfare, especially as former President Donald Trump once again fills top government roles with individuals whose main credentials lie in their unwavering allegiance to him rather than their qualifications. With his recent electoral victory, Trump is pushing the boundaries of federal power, urging Republican senators to bypass their confirmation powers. This raises questions about the balance of power and the very principles of democratic governance.
Trump's latest appointments underscore a trend toward prioritizing loyalty over competence. For instance, Pete Hegseth, a Fox News commentator with a military background but limited high-level experience, has been tapped for the role of Secretary of Defense—a position typically held by seasoned strategists with years of experience in national security. Hegseth's main asset? A staunch, on-air commitment to Trump.
Another eyebrow-raising appointment is Tulsi Gabbard, former congresswoman and a Democrat-turned-Republican ally, who has been selected to lead national intelligence. Tasked with overseeing 18 intelligence agencies, Gabbard’s prior experience doesn’t quite align with the role’s demands. Her public comments, tinged with conspiracy theories and praise for foreign adversaries, leave many questioning her suitability for a position so deeply embedded in national security.
Even the Department of Justice isn't immune. Representative Matt Gaetz, notorious for ethics investigations and controversial behavior, is Trump's choice for Attorney General. A vocal supporter of Trump, Gaetz’s legal career may be marked by political disruptions more than legal prowess.
In one of the boldest moves, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an anti-vaccine advocate with a penchant for conspiracy theories, has been chosen to lead the Department of Health. Kennedy’s views on vaccines and public health stand at odds with mainstream medical science, sparking concerns that his leadership could undermine health policies and spread misinformation.
The trend continues with Elon Musk, assigned to head a commission for slashing federal expenditures. Musk’s connection to social media and private interests adds another layer of complexity, especially given his association with disinformation through platforms he controls.
One can’t help but wonder: with such a cast of characters, will these political figures turn to technology to help balance out their lack of experience? Maybe some will leverage advancements in artificial intelligence to fill in the gaps, offering a curious (and comical) twist on governance. After all, “Let’s see if these politicians can use AI to help them do their jobs with a little more efficiency… if they’re even capable of it!”
Kevin Bihan-Poudec
Founder, Voice For Change Foundation
